.....
It’s totally fine. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html#the-div-element, b) untitled example sentences.Golf blah blah blah
@brucel doctor (whose bio is definitely getting longer) comes to the rescue: http://bit.ly/4kfvxY […]. If it seems like content that shouldn’t have a title when CSS is disabled, then it’s most probably not a section.- However, the spec does say A section, in this context, is a thematic grouping of content, typically with a heading, possibly with a footer.. (emphasis mine). PowerPoint 2010 introduces the concept of sections to achieve this. put off. Ask yourself “What is the natural heading of “content-area”. ‘I mean, the odd thing is that Clinton devoted a large section of the book to his childhood.’ ‘The book is divided into three main sections covering background, methods, and applications.’ ‘Perhaps you could include a small section devoted to explaining the 100 most common acronyms.’ And the same for the other two. These would be sections inside the main content wrap. Some info about cows: eur-lex.europa.eu. @Marcio. Hi, how can I provide the name of each entry in the outline (using outliner tool) without using h1 in HTML5? Copyright © 2021 HTML5 Doctor.
- habitat Section is also the most generic of the sectioning elements. The heading would apply to the article, not that top section. c1) HTML Doctors..nice venture. for use in my example and question! […] informed decision and you’ll make mistakes on the way and will learn from them (just as I and others […]. The absence of a main or content element, while perfectly reasonable once you understand the rules, is distinctly misleading to those who learn by copying and the result is inevitable misuse of the section element in exactly the way the doctors did. Most people would use sections a lot; to wrap up areas of code to disambiguate where sections start and end; to surround areas demarcated with headings inside articles that were to be syndicated, so that the sites that import that content can apply CSS that works for the importing sites’ outline and so the outlining algorithm works correctly. I’m glad that doesn’t force us to have a declared. b) The intro could be a section, we can call it abstract or, resume, It has a natural header. Zeldman’s blog is good for this, @Oli Thanks Oli, fixed with < and > – should have thought of that myself. If they don’t mean for something awful to happen, let’s hope they find a piece of whatever conscience they have left and dial it down before someone gets hurt. Read more about using section appropriately. This sounds really cool. Some sort of section inside an article will need to typically deemed a subsection in the write-up, featuring a personally own concept. b) article is not an option [because our content isn’t relevant for syndication, it isn’t independent by itself]. This is the use of section :). (adjective) An untitled story. Gift of Mimi Haas in honor of Marie-Josée Kravis.
, then does the last
belong to the h2 or the h1? In practice it is natural to want to style a section or article and it is counter intuitive to think otherwise, or have I totally lost the plot? If there’s no header (only with semantic content we can dispute this), then, a DIV will do it. Comments don’t give you these benefits, meaning you should avoid skipping heading levels: authors are strongly encouraged to either use only h1 elements, or to use elements of the appropriate rank for the section’s nesting level, Don’t confuse ‘no default formatting’ with useless ;). Read more about using section appropriately. Like: |article| eur-lex.europa.eu . I’ve written an article called HTML5 articles and sections: what’s the difference? b) What does untitled mean? If it’s something that is meant to be a section on the site structure, then put a section and name it, “main-content-section”, and it will be the section were the main content will reside. If you go to this stop and look to the up the one trail you’ll see a pole that could have your H on it. So, 99% of the time, 99% of authors on 99% of projects would not use the section tag? Hosted by (mt) Media Temple.
Bunch of animals As main content area doesn’t have a specific name, we use the generic ‘section’ tag. The Papal States in central Italy included Rome and were ruled by the Pope.
.....
Let’s imagine a blog with excerpts on the main page. in syndication. adding this – conceptually – If section is taken as a semantic group of something, then a header with a semantic content should be provided. If you see any instances of “untitled section” that corresponds to a section, you’re probably doing it wrong. Posts; Likes; Following; Archive ; I believe this is where your trail ends, If you look at the tip of your end trail it seems to connect to this trail. The article element represents a self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is intended to be independently distributable or reusable ) If we decide to use article to divide our structure: I would like to see some definitive guides on marking up for screen readers but at the moment I’m just trying to wrap my head around semantic markup in general. I can image this is a unit for (external) reuse. # Rules of thumb for using section (It’s fine for a nav or aside element to be untitled, however). A web site’s home page could be split into sections for an introduction, news items, contact information.”. Naturally user might not specify any headers (most often e.g. Either inside an article, if we are talking about an article that as several sections (like the sections of a book, or a law book (like above as been asked). Given those divisions, it seems to make a lot of sense to me to break that up this way: